pirat3s

Hey Pirates. Where were all the titties? I thought I went to see Pirates, the AVN super-movie?

Shiiit. No titties? No doggystyle sword inferno sex? Shiiit. Well, I saw the bitch anyways.

To be honest, I had no desire to see this movie? I HATED the second one, however, after watching Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, I did want to watch all three movies in a row. The only reason I may have wanted to see this movie (other than just being a movie goer) would be because of the name. It sounds like an old mythical type fortune or telling, which is bad ass.
I liked the writing of the movie a lot. Each character had their own story and agenda. It was a bit confusing, but it did come together and I felt that. It was still kind of corny, but I liked the actual sword penetration (which is also found in "Pirates).
The different Jack's were stupid, but the whole Pirate Bretherin was coool.
All right. This wasn't a bad review, and this won't be a bad rating.

Pirates of the Caribbean - At World's End - 3/5

shr333k

All right.
Shrek. Whattup? First a few notes --
- Eddie Murphy is a sell-out
- Puss in Boots is the bomb
- Not feeling the baby crap in the trailer
- I could have waited to rent this

It is well known that I want animated movies to be more..adult. I realize there is only a Shrek the Third to make money, so they have to appeal to more people. I will say that there was great writing, and it didn't even feel as though I were watching a family movie. I just didn't like the plot. I really liked the idea of Arthur and having Merlin in there was great...but nothing really developed or moved along as well as the other ones. They should have done way more. Looking back, it just didn't seem like anything really happened in comparison to the first two movies. It was still funny though.

Shrek the Third - 3/5

two-eight

28 Days Later was the bomb. Different and creepy on a very real level.

New director for 28 Weeks Later. No weird story mixing. They played it all the same. No drastic changes and it all worked. More action and some more action standards were thrown in, but still very, very awesome.
The Dad was weird. But hey, that's rage. I think it was better than 28 Days Later. You know what? It was.

28 Weeks Later - 4/5

fast track

Great potential here.
You've got Zach Braff and Jason Bateman. Funny-man extraordinaire and funny-man. Amanda Peet was a great support. She was excellent.
Now, what I found with this movie, was that the writer said "Oh. This and this would be funny. But how do we connect the funny stuff?" That's what it seemed like. There were some funny parts, but a lot of it just didn't make any sense.
Zach Braff should have just written the movie.
Funny, but not great by any means. Average.

The Ex - 2/5

black widow

So, obviously, super high hopes. Spiderman, being one of my heros, has always been sort of "pooched" movie series. It's no secret that I HATE Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker. In the 90's cartoon, Parker was a dork, still, but stacked, and wasn't fucking emo.

Now, to the movie. It was so corny, straight out of the 70's comic books. Too corny, Tobey was gay, the movie was disappointing. Big ups to James Franco though, he gets top marks. Kirsten Dunst doesn't act and Topher Grace doesn't need to step out of his "70's" role. Tobey is teh fag. Also, when Venom was around, they had short quick shots of him, no real detail at all. Like they were scared to really show him.

Spiderman 3 - 2.5/5